Leelas resignation recall as Kalakshetra director quashed

Saffron32

Editor

posted on 54 years ago — updated on 1 second ago

111
views

Follow us:WhatsappFacebookTwitterTelegram.cls-1{fill:#4d4d4d;}.cls-2{fill:#fff;}Google NewsThe High Court on Wednesday set aside an order of the Centre, allowing Leela Samson to withdraw her resignation and asking her to join duty as the director of Kalakshetra Foundation in Tiruvanmiyur.Once Leela’s resignation was accepted, there was no provision in the Kalakshetra Foundation Act to permit withdrawal of the resignation, Justice S Nagamuthu pointed out.The judge was allowing a writ petition from Sai Sankar and 16 other employees of Kalakshetra, assailing the action of the Centre in permitting Leela to withdraw her resignation and re-appointing her in the same post.Accepting the arguments of petitioners’ senior counsel KM Vijayan, the judge observed that the resignation could not be allowed to be withdrawn as it was not permitted in law.“In such view of the matter, I have no doubt to hold that the impugned order is not sustainable,’’ the judge observed.Appointed in February 2005, Leela attained the age of 60 years in May 2011. Noting that it was the age of super annuation and that she had not resigned yet, a public interest writ petition was filed in the HC. Notice had been ordered.Meanwhile, she wrote to the Centre on April 30 this year seeking to resign from the post. The resignation was accepted with effect from April 30 itself, and an in-charge director was appointed in her place. However, Leela was permitted to continue in the post of director of the Foundation.first published:January 01, 1970, 05:30 ISTlast updated:January 01, 1970, 05:30 IST
window._taboola = window._taboola || [];_taboola.push({mode: 'thumbnails-a', container: 'taboola-below-article-thumbnails', placement: 'Below Article Thumbnails', target_type: 'mix' });Latest News

The High Court on Wednesday set aside an order of the Centre, allowing Leela Samson to withdraw her resignation and asking her to join duty as the director of Kalakshetra Foundation in Tiruvanmiyur.

Once Leela’s resignation was accepted, there was no provision in the Kalakshetra Foundation Act to permit withdrawal of the resignation, Justice S Nagamuthu pointed out.

The judge was allowing a writ petition from Sai Sankar and 16 other employees of Kalakshetra, assailing the action of the Centre in permitting Leela to withdraw her resignation and re-appointing her in the same post.

Accepting the arguments of petitioners’ senior counsel KM Vijayan, the judge observed that the resignation could not be allowed to be withdrawn as it was not permitted in law.

“In such view of the matter, I have no doubt to hold that the impugned order is not sustainable,’’ the judge observed.

Appointed in February 2005, Leela attained the age of 60 years in May 2011. Noting that it was the age of super annuation and that she had not resigned yet, a public interest writ petition was filed in the HC. Notice had been ordered.

Meanwhile, she wrote to the Centre on April 30 this year seeking to resign from the post. The resignation was accepted with effect from April 30 itself, and an in-charge director was appointed in her place. However, Leela was permitted to continue in the post of director of the Foundation.